tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19334316.post3528021597040791142..comments2023-05-08T15:08:59.672+01:00Comments on Shanghai Mui Goes to London: In Berlin we like to drive our convertibles in -10ÂșCTalljoannehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11644323307535539613noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19334316.post-51417280513719041102010-01-29T22:29:05.726+00:002010-01-29T22:29:05.726+00:00very chic car! ;)very chic car! ;)Fonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19334316.post-3064329921985284742010-01-29T22:28:52.774+00:002010-01-29T22:28:52.774+00:00Desperate times, desperate measures...Recession......Desperate times, desperate measures...Recession...Had to sell it... Plan on buying it back one day...Hence tax law!Charlienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19334316.post-92124890484193978142010-01-29T22:28:33.803+00:002010-01-29T22:28:33.803+00:00lol, super sleuthing there, charlie! (Esp re the d...lol, super sleuthing there, charlie! (Esp re the door handles.) I was going to send you a bigger picture, but looks like we don't need it. Indeed, I hesitated when I typed 'convertibles' in the title cos it looked like there was no folding hood. Where is your 3000 now?Talljoannehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11644323307535539613noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19334316.post-79425886886828937422010-01-29T22:28:21.943+00:002010-01-29T22:28:21.943+00:00This is going to sound totally nerdy now, but thin...This is going to sound totally nerdy now, but thinking about it I'm pretty sure its the 100 and not the 3000... The give aways are the lack of door handles, the fact that there is no convertible folding hood visible at all, and the single rear lights. Totally nerdy. I apologise!Charlienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19334316.post-72722803308179699202010-01-29T22:28:03.811+00:002010-01-29T22:28:03.811+00:00I actually think its an Austin Healey 100. I used ...I actually think its an Austin Healey 100. I used to have a 3000, and there are a couple of detail differences to the car in the photo. The single lights on each side of the rear, rather than two above each other, the detailing around the front wing and door, and the shape of the windscreen make it look like one of the earlier 100s. I could be wrong though - its hard to tell from the shot!Charlienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19334316.post-4458129172042224642010-01-29T22:27:50.347+00:002010-01-29T22:27:50.347+00:00Looks like you're right - tks! Another friend ...Looks like you're right - tks! Another friend also said sth similar :)Talljoannehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11644323307535539613noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19334316.post-76652095508858346742010-01-29T22:27:38.889+00:002010-01-29T22:27:38.889+00:00looks like an Austin Healey 3000 from here...?looks like an Austin Healey 3000 from here...?Andrew Keitleynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19334316.post-25323760101730508612010-01-25T11:45:30.166+00:002010-01-25T11:45:30.166+00:00Another friend said Austin Healey 3000 - do you me...Another friend said Austin Healey 3000 - do you mean 1964? :)<br /><br />http://www.austinhealey.com/big.htmlTalljoannehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11644323307535539613noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19334316.post-36417882001355840562010-01-25T08:02:10.967+00:002010-01-25T08:02:10.967+00:00looks like a 1954 austin healey roadster :)looks like a 1954 austin healey roadster :)lennelhttp://lenneltan.comnoreply@blogger.com